Medical Economic Effect of Pharmaceutical Interventions by Board-Certified Pharmacists in Palliative Pharmacy for Patients with Cancer Using Medical Narcotics in Japan: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: The Japanese Society for Pharmaceutical Palliative Care and Sciences specializes in pharmacology in the field of palliative medicine. More than 700 board-certified pharmacists in palliative pharmacy (BCPPP) are actively involved in palliative pharmacotherapy at various hospitals and pharmacies. The purpose of this study was to determine the economic effect of pharmaceutical interventions by BCPPPs. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included 27 medical centers and analyzed the medical economic effect of interventions by BCPPPs (17 pharmacists) and non-BCPPPs (24 pharmacists) on patients using medical narcotics for cancer pain in September 2021. RESULTS: The percentage of patients who received a pharmaceutical intervention and whose drug costs were reduced by pharmacist intervention was significantly higher in the BCPPP group than in the non-BCPPP group. Although there was no significant difference between the two groups in drug cost reduction per patient per month (BCPPP group: $0.89 [-$64.91 to $106.76] vs. non-BCPPP group $0.00 [-$1,828.95 to $25.82]; P = 0.730), the medical economic benefit of pharmacist intervention in avoiding or reducing adverse drug reactions was higher in the BCPPP group ($103.18 [$0.00 to $628.03]) than in the non-BCPPP group ($0.00 [$0.00 to $628.03]) (P = 0.070). The total medical economic benefit-the sum of these-was significantly higher in the BCPPP group ($88.82 [-$14.62 to $705.37]) than in the non-BCPPP group ($0.66 [-$1,200.93 to $269.61]) (P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Pharmacological intervention for patients with cancer using medical narcotics may have a greater medical economic benefit when managed by BCPPPs than by non-certified pharmacists in Japan.

A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study Analyzing the Effect of Polypharmacy on Oxycodone Tolerability.

Polypharmacy is becoming increasingly troublesome in the treatment of cancer. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of concomitant polypharmacy comprising drugs that inhibit CYP3A4 and/or CYP2D6 on the oxycodone tolerability in patients with cancer. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study encompassing 20 hospitals. The data used for the study were obtained during the first 2 wk of oxycodone administration. The incidence of oxycodone discontinuation or dose reductions due to side effects and oxycodone-induced nausea and vomiting (OINV) were compared between patients not treated with either inhibitor and those treated with concomitant CYP3A4 or CYP2D6 inhibitors. The incidence of oxycodone discontinuation or dose reductions in patients treated with ≥3 concomitant CYP2D6 inhibitors (18.2%) tended to be higher than that in patients without this treatment (8.2%; p = 0.09). Moreover, the incidence of OINV in patients treated with 2 concomitant CYP3A4 inhibitors (29.8%) was significantly higher than that in patients without this treatment (15.5%; p = 0.049). Multivariate analysis showed that more than two concomitant CYP3A4 inhibitors and no concomitant use of naldemedine were independent risk factors for OINV. Concomitant polypharmacy involving CYP3A4 inhibitors increases the risk of OINV. Therefore, medications concomitantly used with oxycodone should be optimized.

Multicenter prospective observational study on hospital pharmacist interventions to reduce inappropriate medications.

Background: In Japan, the involvement of hospital pharmacists in inappropriate medications (IMs) practices has not been sufficiently reported. Therefore, this prospective study described the interventions of hospital pharmacists in discontinuing inappropriate drugs or reducing drug doses. Methods: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, observational study to investigate the intervention of hospital pharmacists in inappropriate prescriptions for inpatients in September 2018. Fifty pharmacists from 45 hospitals in Japan participated in this study. IMs were defined as medications that pharmacists deemed inappropriate for patient treatment. The subjects of the study were patients who interacted with the participating pharmacists. Results: During the study period, the median number of beds in hospitals where the 50 participating pharmacists worked was 380, and the average number of beds for which the pharmacists were responsible was 49. The enrolled hospital pharmacists recommended that doctors discontinue or reduce the doses of their regular drugs for 347 out of 1,415 (24.5%) patients. Among the 391 pharmacists' recommendations to reduce IMs for 347 patients, physicians accepted 368 (94.1%) recommendations, and 523 drugs were discontinued as a result. Pharmacist intervention also led to improvements in hypnotic sedation, delirium, and hypotension. The most common reasons for IMs identified by pharmacists were "long-term administration of irresponsible or aimless medications" (44.5%), "adverse effects caused by medications" (31.5%), and "medications-mediated duplication of the pharmacological effect" (15.3%). Approximately 90% of pharmacists' suggestions to reduce medications were accepted for each reason. The average number of regular medications used by patients involved in drug reduction was 8.2, and the average number of medications reduced was 1.7. A sub-analysis showed that patients using opioids tended to take more medications, and these patients were able to reduce the amount of medications taken. Interventions by pharmacists certified in palliative pharmacies tended to reduce adverse drug events. Conclusion: This was the first multicenter prospective observational study conducted in Japan to demonstrate hospital pharmacist intervention's effectiveness in promoting appropriate prescription and, consequently, a reduction in the number of medications in use and polypharmacy.

Y-site Injection Physical Compatibility of Remdesivir with Select Intravenous Drugs Used in Palliative Care and for Treating Coronavirus Disease 2019.

BACKGROUND: No compatibility tests are available for remdesivir other than 0.9% sodium chloride. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the physical compatibility of remdesivir with drugs used in palliative care and COVID-19 treatment. METHODS: Remdesivir was tested for compatibility with 10 different drugs (fentanyl, morphine, hydromorphone, oxycodone, heparin, furosemide, octreotide, acetated Ringer's injection, 2-in-1 peripheral parenteral nutrition, and 2-in-1 total parenteral nutrition). Remdesivir was formulated to a final concentration of 1 mg/mL, and the other drugs were prepared at clinical concentrations. Three test solutions were used for compatibility testing, with remdesivir and the target drugs compounded in a 1:1 ratio. Appearance measurements, including Tyndall effect, turbidity, and pH, were performed immediately after mixing and at 1 h and 4 h after mixing. Changes in appearance, including the Tyndall effect, turbidity (turbidity change of ≥ 0.5 nephelometric turbidity unit [NTU] based on control solution for each test drug), and pH (a change of ≥ 10% based on the pH immediately after mixing) were used to determine physical compatibility. RESULTS: All the drugs tested were compatible with remdesivir. The combination of remdesivir and furosemide produced the highest turbidity (0.23 ± 0.03 NTU) 1 h after mixing. The lowest and highest pH values were observed at 4 h after mixing for the combinations of remdesivir and morphine (3.23 ± 0.02) and remdesivir and furosemide (8.81 ± 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The drugs tested in this study show Y-site physical compatibility with remdesivir.

Physical compatibility of remimazolam with opioid analgesics, sedatives, and muscle relaxants during simulated Y-site administration.

PURPOSE: There is a lack of information on the compatibility of remimazolam with opioid analgesics, muscle relaxants, and other sedatives. This study aimed to evaluate the physical compatibility of remimazolam with these drug classes. METHODS: Remimazolam was combined with 1 or 2 target drugs (remifentanil, fentanyl, rocuronium, vecuronium, dexmedetomidine, and midazolam). Ten physical compatibility tests were conducted, including four 3-drug compatibility tests. Remimazolam was dissolved in 0.9% sodium chloride injection to a final concentration of 5 mg/mL. Other medications were diluted in 0.9% sodium chloride injection to obtain clinically relevant concentrations. Compatibility tests were conducted with 3 test solutions, wherein remimazolam and the target drugs were compounded at equal volume ratios (1:1 or 1:1:1). Visual appearance was assessed and testing of Tyndall effect, turbidity, and pH was performed immediately after mixing and then again 1 hour and 4 hours after mixing. Appearance and turbidity were evaluated by comparison with the control solution of each target drug diluted with 0.9% sodium chloride injection to the same concentration as the test solution. RESULTS: All drugs tested were determined to be compatible with remimazolam. The drug combination with the highest change of turbidity was remimazolam and vecuronium (a mean increase of 0.16 NTU relative to the remimazolam control solution), 4 hours after mixing. The combination with the highest pH was remimazolam, fentanyl, and vecuronium (mean [SD], 3.76 [0.01]), 4 hours after mixing. The combination of remimazolam and fentanyl showed a larger change in pH at 4 hours after mixing (a mean increase of 2.6%) than immediately after mixing. CONCLUSION: Remifentanil, fentanyl, rocuronium, vecuronium, dexmedetomidine, and midazolam are physically compatible with remimazolam during simulated Y-site administration.

Opioid-Related Respiratory Depression in Non-Cancer Patients, as Reported in the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report Database.

BACKGROUND: Opioid-induced respiratory depression (RD) is a potentially life-threatening adverse drug event. This study used the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database to investigate the profile of opioid-related RD in non-cancer patients. METHODS: We analyzed data recorded in the JADER database between April 2004 and February 2020, which were downloaded from the Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Agency website. Reporting odds ratios for RD were calculated for the 20 opioids approved in Japan, and daily dose and onset time were further analyzed for opioids used in chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP). RESULTS: Among the opioids, RD adverse event signals were detected for 22 combinations of opioids and administration routes in non-cancer patients. Of these combinations, transdermal buprenorphine and oral tramadol/acetaminophen were approved for CNCP and tended to be reported more frequently in elderly patients. The median daily doses of transdermal buprenorphine and oral tramadol/acetaminophen were 10.0 and 22.5 mg of daily oral morphine equivalent doses, respectively, which are within the standard range for starting dosage. The median time-to-onset of transdermal buprenorphine and oral tramadol/acetaminophen was 6.5 and 4.0 days, respectively, and 75% of cases were reported within 20 to 40 days after the start of treatment. The hazard type for both opioids was classified as early failure. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that elderly CNCP patients should be closely monitored after the start of opioid treatment, especially during the first week and, if possible, for 1 month, even if starting doses are within ranges recommended by the manufacturer and guidelines.

Japanese Nationwide Comparative Survey of Medication Guidance Provided by Certified and Uncertified Palliative Care Pharmacists.

BACKGROUND: As members of a medical team, pharmacists are expected to provide optimal patient-centered, evidence-based pharmacotherapy. In Japan, in consideration of the importance of palliative care, a system was initiated for certifying palliative care pharmacists in 2010. However, no studies have evaluated the usefulness of board certification in palliative pharmacy. Therefore, we surveyed the status of medication guidance for the physical and psychological symptoms of patients receiving palliative care and compared the medication guidance provided by certified and uncertified pharmacists. METHODS: The survey was conducted in February and March 2022. Pharmacists registered as members of the Japanese Society of Pharmaceutical Palliative Care and Sciences were surveyed by using a web-based questionnaire and 209 pharmacists responded: the certified pharmacist group comprised 123 (58.9%) pharmacists and the uncertified pharmacist group comprised 86 (41.1%) pharmacists. RESULTS: The certified pharmacist group provided better and more frequent medication guidance, according to responses to four of the six items related to pain relief. Three items were related to non-pain symptom relief, and one of the four items was related to psychiatric symptom relief (P < 0.05). The study showed that the certified pharmacist group received a better rating than the uncertified pharmacist group for involvement in palliative pharmacotherapy leading to improvement of patient quality of life (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: As compared with uncertified pharmacists, certified pharmacists intervened more proactively and provided a broader range of palliative care.

Utility of a Compatibility Chart for Continuous Infusions in the Intensive Care Unit.

BACKGROUND: In the intensive care unit (ICU), multiple intravenous drugs are often administered through the same catheter line, greatly increasing the risk of drug incompatibility. We previously developed a compatibility chart including 27 drugs and have used it to avoid drug incompatibilities in the ICU. This retrospective study evaluated the utility of this chart by analyzing prescriptions and incidents of incompatibilities in an ICU. METHODS: We analyzed 257 ICU prescriptions of two or more continuous infusions on the same day during the period between March 2016 and February 2017 and investigated the rate of compliance with the compatibility chart. Drug combinations were classified as "compatible," "tolerable compatible," "incompatible," and "no data." For all combinations, the compliance rate was defined as the ratio of compatible and tolerable compatible combinations. Additionally, using our hospital incident report database, we analyzed 27,117 injections administered in the ICU between March 2016 and February 2017 and investigated incidents related to incompatibility. RESULTS: Three hundred infusion combinations were identified in the prescriptions. The compliance rate was 97% (n = 293). Of the 113 combinations judged to be tolerable compatible, 98% (n = 111) consisted of three or more continuous medications injected through the same intravenous line. Of the two incidents related to incompatibility in the incident report database, the combination "nicardipine and furosemide" was defined as incompatible in the compatibility chart. CONCLUSIONS: The high rate of compliance with the compatibility chart suggested it was useful in preventing drug incompatibility.

Multicentre prospective observational study on community pharmacist interventions to reduce inappropriate medications.

OBJECTIVES: The status of community pharmacists' involvement in inappropriate prescription practices among outpatients who visit community pharmacies has not been reported in Japan. Therefore, this study described community pharmacists' interventions aimed at the discontinuation of inappropriate drugs or the reduction of drug doses. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre prospective observational study of pharmacists' interventions on inappropriate prescriptions for outpatients during a 1-month period in September 2018. A total of 28 pharmacists from 28 community pharmacies in Japan participated in this study. We analysed cases in which pharmacists discontinued drugs or changed the doses due to drugs being inappropriate, adverse effects, duplication of pharmacological effects and drug-drug interactions. KEY FINDINGS: Community pharmacists provided interventions for 736 patients at an average of 26.2 patients per day during the study period. The pharmacists recommended that doctors discontinue inappropriate drugs or reduce the doses of regular drugs for 103 patients (13.9%). Among the 107 pharmacist recommendations to decrease inappropriate prescriptions, 83 (77.6%) were accepted, including 62 cases of discontinuation (57.9%) and 21 of drug dose reduction (19.6%). A total of 122 drugs were discontinued according to pharmacists' recommendations. In addition, pharmacists' intervention improved sleepiness, sedation and cognitive function. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the active involvement of community pharmacists in polypharmacy by discontinuing inappropriate drugs or reducing the dose of regular drugs, which may contribute to the improvement of adverse effects among outpatients.

Blood concentration of levetiracetam after bolus administration in patients with status epilepticus.

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the blood concentration of levetiracetam (LEV), as a second-line drug, in patients with status epilepticus (SE) in an emergency clinical setting. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 20 consecutive patients with SE admitted to our department between July 2017 and July 2019. LEV (2500 mg) was administered via bolus infusion after diazepam infusion, followed by 500 mg every 12 h for 48 h and then 500 mg orally. The primary outcomes were LEV blood concentration 15 min, 12 h, 48 h, and 96 h after administration and the proportion of patients showing trough LEV concentration within the therapeutic range. The secondary outcomes were the discontinuation of apparent convulsive seizure, epileptic wave on electroencephalogram, tracheal intubation, adverse events related to blood parameters, and abnormal findings in vital signs examination. RESULTS: Median blood LEV (2500 mg) concentration at 15 min after administration was 81.6 µg/mL. The median trough concentration after 12, 48, and 96 h was 28.8, 10.5, and 9.1 µg/mL, respectively. Moreover, 95% of patients had trough concentration above the lower limit of the therapeutic blood concentration (>12 µg/mL) after 12 h. Regarding secondary outcomes, endotracheal intubation, seizure suppression, and abnormal electroencephalogram findings were observed in approximately 40%, 90%-95%, and 41% of patients, respectively. No abnormal findings were noted in blood tests and vital sign examination, although the AST/ALT levels increased in 10% of the patients. CONCLUSION: After bolus administration of 2500 mg, the blood LEV concentration reached the therapeutic window in patients with early-stage SE.

Physical Compatibility of Nafamostat with Analgesics, Sedatives, and Muscle Relaxants for Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019.

BACKGROUND: Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may require continuous administration of analgesics, sedatives, and muscle relaxants. Nafamostat has recently been reported as a therapeutic agent for COVID-19. However, there is a lack of information on the compatibility of nafamostat with the aforementioned drug classes. This study evaluated the physical compatibility of nafamostat with these drug classes. METHODS: Nafamostat was combined with 1-3 target drugs (fentanyl, morphine, midazolam, dexmedetomidine, and rocuronium). Fifteen physical compatibility tests were conducted. Nafamostat was dissolved in 5% glucose solution; the final concentration was 10 mg/mL. All other medications were diluted in 0.9% sodium chloride to obtain clinically relevant concentrations. The power of hydrogen (pH) of all medications was measured during each test. Compatibility tests were conducted with 4 test solutions in which nafamostat and the target drugs were compounded at equal volume ratios (1:1, 1:1:1, or 1:1:1:1). Visual appearance, turbidity, and pH were evaluated immediately after mixing and at 1 and 3 hours. Physical incompatibilities were defined as gross precipitation, cloudiness, appearance of the Tyndall effect, or a turbidity change of ≥0.5 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU) based on nafamostat. RESULTS: The mean pH of nafamostat was 3.13 ± 0.03. The combination of nafamostat, fentanyl, and dexmedetomidine had the highest pH (3.39 ± 0.01; 3 hours after mixing). All drugs were compatible with nafamostat until 3 hours after admixture, with a mean turbidity value of ≤0.03 NTU. CONCLUSIONS: Infusions combining nafamostat with the tested sedatives, analgesics, and muscle relaxants could be safely administered.

A nationwide survey of hospital pharmacist interventions to improve polypharmacy for patients with cancer in palliative care in Japan.

BACKGROUND: There is no nationwide data on polypharmacy in palliative care in Japan. In this study, the research committee of the Japanese Society for Pharmaceutical Palliative Care and Sciences conducted an online survey on polypharmacy and inappropriate prescriptions involving its members who worked as hospital pharmacists. METHODS: The online questionnaire included questions about hospital pharmacist interventions for cancer patients who regularly used six or more drugs during a two-month period from October to November 2017. RESULTS: Of 2618 hospital pharmacists, 359 responded (13.7%). With regard to cancer patients receiving opioids, 40.9 and 22.3% of the respondents replied that percentages of patients prescribed six or more regular medications were "40-69%" and "70-99%," respectively. Regarding patients on polypharmacy, 73.0% of the respondents reported a low or moderate rate of inappropriate prescriptions, with responses such as "long-term administration of irresponsible or aimless medications", "adverse drug reactions," and "duplication of the pharmacological effect". Furthermore, 24.2, 46.8, and 23.4% of respondents replied that the rates of drug reduction due to pharmacist recommendations were "0", "1-39%", and "more than 40%," respectively. Pharmacist interventions decreased the use of inappropriate medications, including antiemetics, gastrointestinal medications, and hypnotic sedatives, and reduced or prevented adverse drug reactions such as extrapyramidal symptoms, delirium, and sleepiness. Similar results were obtained for cancer patients who did not use opioids. However, the rates of cancer patients on polypharmacy and with reduction of inappropriate medications by pharmacist interventions were significantly higher in cancer patients receiving opioids. Finally, recommendations of board-certified pharmacists in palliative pharmacy contributed to a decrease in the use of inappropriate medications in cancer patients on polypharmacy (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: This nationwide survey clarified pharmacist interventions for polypharmacy in palliative care in Japan. Our data showed frequent polypharmacy in cancer patients receiving opioids, and benefits of pharmacist interventions, especially by board-certified pharmacists in palliative pharmacy, for reducing inappropriate medications and improving adverse drug reactions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study approval numbers in the institution; 0046. Registered November 6, 2017.

Analyses of Respiratory Depression Associated with Opioids in Cancer Patients Based on the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report Database.

Opioid-induced respiratory depression is a potentially life-threatening adverse drug event. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of respiratory depression using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) Database to obtain data to promote proper use of opioids. The JADER database from April 2004 to March 2017 was obtained from the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. We calculated the reporting odds ratios (RORs) of suspected opioids (morphine, fentanyl, oxycodone, tapentadol, methadone, tramadol, pentazocine, buprenorphine, and codeine phosphate hydrate), analyzed the daily dose at first appearance and the time-to-onset profile, and assessed the hazard type using the Weibull shape parameter. ROR analysis detected adverse event signals for all opioids. Morphine showed a large ROR value with statistical significance in elderly (≥70 years old) patients. The median daily doses of oral morphine and oxycodone for inducing respiratory depression were comparably low (30 mg/d as oral morphine equivalent dose), while that of transdermal fentanyl was 120 mg/d (oral morphine equivalent dose). On time-to-onset analysis using the Weibull distribution, those opioids were classified as the early failure type. The median time-to-onset of oral morphine, oral oxycodone and transdermal fentanyl was 5.5, 11 and 12.5 d, respectively, and almost 50% of cases were reported within 30 d. Taken together, our results suggest that it is important to monitor patients carefully for at least the first one week to one month, even if opioids are administered at a relatively low dose, especially in elderly patients administered morphine.

Current Status of Adverse Events Related with Opioid Analgesics in Japan: Assessment Based on Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report Database.

Opioid analgesics have greatly contributed to the advancement of pain management. However, although opioids have been appropriately used in Japan, they rarely induce serious adverse events, such as respiratory depression. The present study aimed to investigate the temporal changes in the occurrence of opioid-related adverse events and deaths between 2004 and 2017 in Japan using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database. We analyzed the following points using data extracted from JADER website: 1) temporal changes in the number and proportion of opioid-related adverse event reports; 2) temporal changes in the number of morphine-, oxycodone-, and fentanyl-related adverse event reports per annual consumption; and 3) cases in which the reported outcome following opioid-related adverse events was death. Our results showed no dramatic changes in the overall incidence of opioid-related adverse events, despite the temporal changes in the annual consumption and shared component of each opioid during the survey period. However, the number and rate of fentanyl-related adverse events and their outcome "death" increased since 2010, being the highest among all adverse event including those related to morphine and oxycodone. Outcome "death" by fentanyl-related adverse events was caused mainly due to respiratory depression. These findings suggest that, although opioid-related adverse events can be controlled through proper monitoring and management by medical personnel in Japan, extra caution should be continuously paid for the rare but serious fentanyl-induced adverse events.

A Nationwide Survey of Community Pharmacist Contributions to Polypharmacy in Opioid-Using and Non-using Cancer Patients in Japan.

No nationwide study on polypharmacy in palliative care among Japanese community pharmacies has yet been conducted. We conducted an online questionnaire survey for community pharmacist members of The Japanese Society for Pharmaceutical Palliative Care and Sciences regarding their contributions to cancer patients who regularly used six or more drugs, including opioids, in service during the two-month period from October to November 2017. Of 579 community pharmacists, 83 responded to the survey (14.3%). Among them, 47.0 and 27.7% of respondents replied that more than 40% of opioid-using and non-using cancer patients were prescribed six or more regular medications, respectively. The proportion of patients with polypharmacy was marginally higher among opioid-using than non-using patients. Additionally, 31.3 and 22.9% of respondents replied that a low or moderate rate of opioid-using and non-using patients with polypharmacy received inappropriate prescriptions, respectively, including "unnecessary medications," "adverse drug reactions" and "duplication of pharmacological effect." The proportion of patients who received inappropriate prescriptions was significantly higher among opioid-using than non-using patients. Furthermore, 37.3 and 19.3% of respondents replied that pharmacist's recommendations contributed to drug reduction in opioid-using and non-using patients with polypharmacy who received inappropriate prescriptions, respectively. The responders with higher confidence in palliative care showed more success rate for reducing inappropriate medications. Our findings suggest that opioid use can be associated with an increased risk of polypharmacy in cancer patients, and that recommendations by a population of community pharmacists can reduce inappropriate medications and improve adverse drug reactions in both opioid-using and non-using cancer patients with polypharmacy.

Ototoxicity of gentian violet on the guinea pig cochlea.

PURPOSE: Gentian violet (GV) is an antimicrobial and antifungal agent that has been used widely to treat intractable discharge in the ear. The purpose of this report is to warn clinicians about the ototoxic effect of GV in the middle ear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: GV ototoxicity was evaluated by measuring compound action potentials (CAPs) in the VIIIth nerve in adult Hartley guinea pigs. The middle ear cavities of the animals were filled with GV solution (0.5% or 0.13%), and CAPs were measured after intervals of 5 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 6, and 24 hours. After all measurements were completed, the temporal bones were harvested for histopathologic evaluation. Celloidin-embedded specimens were cut into 20-µm slices and examined using light microscopy. The bacteriostatic activity of GV was evaluated using a disk-diffusion assay. RESULTS: A 0.5% GV solution produced a mild elevation in the CAP threshold at 30 minutes, a greater reduction at 1 hour, and complete abolishment of CAP at 24 hours. A 0.13% GV solution caused mild elevation in the CAP threshold at 2 hours and severe elevation at 6 hours. Massive new bone formation was found in the middle ear cavity at 6 weeks. GV concentrations of 0.13% and 0.06% were effective against all bacteria tested, with the exception of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. CONCLUSIONS: Although GV has marked antibacterial and antifungal activities, its use should be limited to the external ear canal. GV exerts an ototoxic effect in a concentration- and time-dependent manner, and so the use of this drug in the middle ear cavity is not recommended.

[The timing of the appearance of oral mucositis induced by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 for head and neck cancer].

Oral mucositis is a frequent adverse event in patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Although the management of oral mucositis is essential to improve treatment completion rates, no detailed studies on the time of oral mucositis appearance have been reported. We conducted a retrospective study on the timing of the appearance of oral mucositis induced by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 for head and neck cancer. A total of 11 patients with head and neck cancer who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 were examined. All patients developed oral mucositis within 13.8 ± 5.6 days after the initiation of radiotherapy (20.4 ± 8.1 Gy). In addition, the effects of pain-associated symptoms caused by oral mucositis on the patients' nutritional status, including reduction in caloric intake (24.4% ± 31.1%), weight loss (5.2% ± 5.2%), and duration of a regular diet (24.5 ± 17.1 days), were observed and lasted until the completion of radiation therapy. The delineation of the timing of oral mucositis appearance has become a key motivator for the patients to perform oral care proactively to limit severity and serves as a necessary index for monitoring oral health and managing pain and nutrition.

Ototoxicity of Burow solution on the guinea pig cochlea.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the ototoxicity of Burow solution. PROCEDURES: Compound action potentials (CAPs) of the eighth nerve were measured before and 30 minutes after the application of the Burow solution in the middle ear cavity. RESULTS: Use of the original Burow solution (pH 3.5) for 30 minutes caused a significant reduction of click sounds. A 2-fold diluted Burow solution (pH 4.4) for 30 minutes caused no reduction in CAP threshold. Burow solution, pH adjusted to 4.5, caused no changes in CAP threshold at 30 minutes. At 24 hours, Burow solution (pH 3.5) caused complete abolition of CAP. CONCLUSIONS: Burow solution is ototoxic in the guinea pig when applied in the middle ear cavity for 30 minutes or longer. In the clinical settings, it is advisable to avoid allowing the solution to contact the round window for extended times.

Advantage of early induction of opioid to control pain induced by irradiation in head and neck cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: Although radiotherapy is effective for head and neck cancer patients, the local pain evoked by the irradiation itself reduces food intake and frequently halts the treatment. Thus, pain control is an important problem in radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. We performed to examine whether early induction of low-dose, opioid from mild pain improves dietary and caloric intake, while reducing weight loss. METHODS: The subjects were 43 patients who were hospitalized for head and neck cancer from 2004 to 2008. They were patients who underwent radiation treatment but those who did not undergo preoperative treatment. They were divided into two groups, depending on whether the pain was mild or moderate when an opioid was introduced (MILD and MODERATE, N=23 and 20, respectively). RESULTS: The visual analog scale scores for pain were significantly lower in the MILD than in the MODERATE group at between 25 and 50 Gy. The amount of oxycodone used for pain was significantly lower in the MILD than the MODERATE group. A regular diet was maintained for significantly longer in the MILD group. Caloric intake was significantly higher in the MILD group at over 20 Gy. Weight loss was significantly lower in the MILD group at over 20 Gy. The incidence of side effects was equal in both groups. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that the introduction of opioids for mild pain during radiotherapy controls the level of pain, improving food intake in head and neck cancer patients.

[Survey on patients' satisfaction with opioid rescue guidance by pharmacists].

To examine the influence of drug therapy guidance by pharmacists on the use of a rescue dose (RD) for opioid analgesics (opioids) and pain as well as drug therapy guidance in cancer pain treatment, we conducted a patient satisfaction survey. The subjects were 56 cancer patients undergoing opioid therapy in hospitals belonging to the Symptom Control Research Group (SCORE-G). The survey period was 2 months (from November 1 until December 31, 2006). Drug therapy guidance regarding the use of RD was performed twice in each patient to evaluate the patients' satisfaction. RD was prescribed in 87.8% of the patients in the first guidance and in 80.5% in the second guidance periods. The proportion of patients who used RD significantly increased from 63.8% to 87.5%. Five items significantly improved in the second guidance period: "marked analgesic effects," "satisfaction with current treatment," "correct understanding of RD usage," "relief through RD," and "appropriate use of RD." On comprehensive evaluation following the second round of guidance, 81% of the patients reported overall satisfaction, and 78% reported the usefulness of guidance in pain treatment. These results suggest that positive guidance by pharmacists increases patients' satisfaction. In providing guidance, it was important to confirm the characteristics and side effects of opioids as well as the necessity of RD to patients accurately and repeatedly.